Blogs Detail

Know More About AOMA
You are here: Home » AOMA BLOG » Industry News » Hyaluronic Acid vs. Calcium Hydroxylapatite: Choosing the Right Filler for You

Hyaluronic Acid vs. Calcium Hydroxylapatite: Choosing the Right Filler for You

Views: 0     Author: Site Editor     Publish Time: 2025-10-14      Origin: Site

Inquire

facebook sharing button
twitter sharing button
line sharing button
wechat sharing button
linkedin sharing button
pinterest sharing button
whatsapp sharing button
sharethis sharing button


In the dynamic field of aesthetic medicine, your choice of dermal fillers directly reflects the standards and expertise of your clinic. For distributors, clinics and hospitals aiming to optimize their product portfolios, it is crucial to understand the core differences between hyaluronic acid (HA) and hydroxyapatite calcium (CaHA). This guide provides a clear comparative analysis to empower your purchasing decisions and ensure that you offer the most effective solutions for your doctors and their patients.


Understand Core Technologies


Hyaluronic acid (HA) : A multifunctional moisturizer




AOMA Hyaluronic acid product series


Hyaluronic acid is a glycosaminoglycan, a naturally occurring sugar molecule in our skin, which can bind substances in water more than 1,000 times its weight.


Mechanism of action: Hyaluronic acid fillers mainly function through immediate volume filling and tissue hydration. They are like miniature sponges, absorbing moisture to make the skin plump, and smoothing out wrinkles and increasing skin moisture from within.


The main clinical advantage: The prominent feature of HA is its reversibility. Hyaluronidase can rapidly dissolve hyaluronic acid fillers, making it a low-risk option for both doctors and patients. This flexibility allows for a wide range of indications, from subtle lip enhancement to correcting surface wrinkles.


Calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) : Structural regenerant


AOMA Cahafill LD


Calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA) is a biocompatible mineral that is the same as the main component of human bones and teeth.


Mechanism of action: CaHA adopts a dual-mode mechanism. It provides immediate structural correction after injection. Subsequently, it acts as a scaffold and, over time, can promote the body to produce its own collagen.


Main clinical advantages: Due to the formation of new collagen, CaHA has superior lifespan and progressive effects. It usually offers lasting effects for 12 to 18 months and provides outstanding structural improvement.



Feature


Hyaluronic Acid Fillers


CaHA Fillers



Mechanism


Physical Filler + Hydration

Scaffold + Collagen Stimulation


Immediate Results


Yes

Yes (with improving results over weeks


Longevity


6 - 12 Months

12 - 18 Months


Reversibility


Yes (with Hyaluronidase)

No


Ideal Applications


Lips, Fine Lines, Tear Troughs, Hydration

Deep Folds (e.g., Nasolabial), Cheek Augmentation, Jawline Contouring,Hand Rejuvenation


Strategic Product Matching: Optimizing Solutions for Different Client Profiles


Client Profile

Primary Needs

Recommended Formula


Our Solution


First-time/Comfort-focused Clients Minimal discomfort, natural-looking enhancement HA-based fillers with anesthetic

Deep Lins with Lido - Pre-mixed lidocaine ensures comfortable injection experience

Volume Loss/Anti-aging Clients Structural restoration, long-term collagen stimulation Calcium hydroxylapatite fillers AOMA CAHA - Provides immediate volume with progressive collagen regeneration
Precision Enhancement ClientsEnhancement Clients Subtle refinement in delicate areas Highly adaptable HA fillers

Deep Lins Series -Optimal balance between viscosity and spreadability for precise application


Comprehensive Product Portfolio for Diverse Clinical Needs


Our product matrix is engineered to address the complete spectrum of aesthetic concerns while maintaining the highest standards of safety and efficacy. The Deep Lines with Lido series represents our advanced HA platform, integrating 0.3% lidocaine HCl to significantly reduce injection discomfort without compromising product longevity or performance. This formulation is particularly valuable for enhancing patient experience in sensitive treatment areas.


Guangzhou AOMA Biological Technology Co., Ltd delivers robust structural support for demanding aesthetic applications. The standardized CaHA microspheres suspended in aqueous gel carrier demonstrate consistent elevation capacity for midface augmentation and mandibular contouring. Clinical monitoring shows 85% patient satisfaction rates maintained at 12-month follow-up, supported by objective collagen density improvement measured through ultrasound imaging.


All AOMA products maintain ISO 13485 certification and CE marking, with comprehensive technical documentation supporting global regulatory requirements. Our manufacturing facilities implement rigorous quality control protocols, ensuring batch-to-batch consistency in viscosity, sterility, and particle size distribution.


Conclusion: Partnership in Clinical Excellence


Successful aesthetic practice requires both clinical expertise and optimized material selection. By understanding patient demographics and matching them with appropriate technologies, practitioners can achieve superior outcomes across diverse client profiles. Our product portfolio provides scientifically-validated solutions for the complete range of aesthetic indications, from subtle enhancement to structural restoration.


We invite medical professionals to access our clinical support materials, including injection technique guides and product specification documents. Our technical team provides comprehensive consultation services to assist in protocol development and product selection.


AOMA Exhibition Review


FAQ


Q1: What are the main differences between hyaluronic acid fillers and calcium hydroxylapatite fillers?

HA fillers are collagen-boosting, reversible, and typically provide immediate volume with varying longevity (6–18+ months) depending on product. CaHA fillers are thicker, stimulate collagen over time, offer longer-lasting volume (12–24+ months), and are less reversible. Choice depends on treatment area, desired longevity, and patient preferences.


Q2: Which filler lasts longer: HA fillers or CaHA fillers?

Generally, CaHA fillers last longer than many HA fillers (often 12–24 months, sometimes longer with certain products), while HA fillers typically range from 6–18 months. Actual duration varies by product, injection site, metabolism, and lifestyle.


Q3: Are HA fillers or CaHA fillers better for cheek augmentation?

For mid-face volume, both can be effective. HA fillers offer lighter, immediately adjustable results and reversibility, while CaHA provides durable support and potential collagen stimulation. Clinician expertise and individual anatomy largely determine the best option.


Q4: Do CaHA fillers require a special technique or equipment?

CaHA fillers can be more viscous and may require careful handling, sometimes using cannulas or specific injection planes. Ultrasound guidance is not required but can aid accuracy in complex areas. Training and experience are essential.


Q5: Can I combine HA and CaHA fillers in a single treatment?

Yes. A layered approach can combine HA for immediate, precise contouring with CaHA for longer-lasting lift/t projection and collagen stimulation. A comprehensive treatment plan by an experienced injector can optimize results and longevity.

Specialists in Cell and Hyaluronic Acid Research.
  +86-13924065612            
  +86-13924065612
  +86-13924065612

Meet AOMA

Laboratory

Product Category

Blogs

Copyright © 2024 AOMA Co., Ltd. All Rights Reserved. SitemapPrivacy Policy. Supported by leadong.com
Contact Us